Nathan Davis

A Trend Away - Unpopular Realities

Comments

[this is good]

I don't have time right now to weigh in on each of these, but I think we go wrong when we simply pick and choose which parts of the Bible we want to emphasize.

On a personal level we can avoid this error by reading and studying through the whole Bible as we would any other book.

Many churches are trying to be more like parchurch organizations with a narrow focus. For instance Campus Crusade emphasizes evangelism, Navigators emphasizes discipleship, etc. but then these organizations are not the end destination for believers. The church is where they will grow further in the Word and fellowship throughout the rest of life.

So the church needs to be much broader in its emphasis and teaching and in the people they minister to. Here too, expository preaching through the Bible will assure that we focus on what God thinks is important.

The Bible teaches evangelism and kindness and care for the poor and all of the outreach possibilities. It also emphasises correct doctrine vs false teaching, honoring the aged, encouraging youth, etc, etc. To be well rounded Christians we need to be in the Word both personally and corporately.

Reality 7: End Times, particularly the return of Christ.

For a number of years our pastor was Tim LaHaye who collaborated with Jerry Jenkins on the Left Behind series. Tim was the Bible teacher and Jerry the fiction writer.

The reason LaHaye decided to go the fiction route was because modern day Christians are not into picking up a book on Theology. He also was concerned that the seminaries were not teaching about the Rapture and so young pastors were not equiped to teach this part of prophesy, particularly the book of Revelation. So when it doesn't get taught, the average Christian doesn't think it is important.

I have been raked over the coals for defending the Rapture. not by un-believers, but by other Christians who call it un-Biblical and "cultish."

Signs/Wonders/Prophecy were never part of most Churches (Methodist, Lutherans, etc), it was unique to Pentecostals. Even today they are the only ones that have speaking in tongues as a normal part of their service.

My point exactly. Why do we avoid such paramount emphasis, tones, and common threads in Scripture. Just focusing on the Messiah's life alone we see all these elements and no small amount of them either conveyed through action or word.
[this is good]

I can tell that you're not a universalist or a cessationist...good for you. I have tended toward both of these fallacies at different points in my walk. There is a freedom in the truth that cannot be explained...it has to be experienced. You can't tell a cessationist about the freedom of exercising the gift of prophecy or tongues, for example, it just sound like crazy-talk until you've experience it.

It's important in any discussion of cessationism to ask: When did these gifts supposedly become obsolete? Since they were obviously at work in the first century and examples of their normal continuation can be found as late as the fifth century. In fact, to this day, the Catholic dogma is that Holy Communion is a recurring miracle and documented supernatural signs continue to be a prerequisite for sainthood.

It is more technically correct to say that signs/wonders/prophecy were never a part of most modern churches (that is to say, after the 14th century). It is not coincidental that this happened during the Age of Reason, when everything mystical and supernatural was being sacrificed on the altar of Man's Intellect. It's very possible that elements of the Reformation, in trying to weed out corrupt practices like the sale of Indulgence (heaven-tickets for the dead), threw the proverbial baby out with the bathwater and it took 500 years to correct the error.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement

  • Powered by Vox